Research with Embryos: Genocide in Mass or Scientific Advance? Summary Currently, the embryos have been object of quarrel in the field of the biotica for the questioning of the moment of the beginning of the life. This reply it will be able to define the routes of the research and the human behavior. This research was carried through through a brief bibliographical survey and presents the positioning of the author in relation to this fact. Divergence between religious scientists, laypeople and how much to the initial moment of the life of a human being is observed in extreme literature. By the same author: podiatrists. The author defends, as conclusion of its research, that does not exist solid bases that define the moment of the beginning of the life and that it considers the fecundao as starting point not only of formation of an organism, but of one human being. Words key: embryo, life, biotica. Introduction This article has as purpose to try to show the possibilities of the human embryo, possibilities these that are very real since the moment of the conception.
But, the difficulty esbarra exactly in a doubt that atrocity for ones represents and a probability of hope for others. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from immune system. Not obstante, already it is observed that it has a great problem in question. The research with embryos is genocide in mass or is scientific advance? To search such reply we will be showing varied points of view, since scientific, philosophical, biological and religious the principles. Based in these conceptions it tries we remos to reach the main objective that it will show that the embryo, since its conception, is deserving a human being endowed with rights and of respect. in objectives subliminares we will show as independent of some points of view, the zygote – or embryo – has its particularitities and individualities that must be shown and of this form to prove that from the union of two cells we have much more that an cell-egg or daily pay-embryo.